We Handle All Logistics
Venue booking, product transport, portion preparation, temperature control, waste disposal — you focus on the brief, we handle the rest.
Product testing, sensory evaluation & packaging research under controlled conditions
0b1633] font-semibold”>Standards & Compliance in Sensory Research
#0b1633] font-semibold”>A hall test is a quantitative research method in which recruited consumers evaluate products, packaging, or advertising materials under standardised, controlled conditions at a designated venue. Respondents are exposed to identical stimuli — same lighting, temperature, portion size, and presentation order — which eliminates external variables and produces statistically comparable results. At Fieldstat, we deliver end-to-end hall test projects across Poland: from venue selection and respondent recruitment to product logistics, on-site moderation, and data analysis. A typical study with 100–300 participants is completed in 2–5 days, giving you reliable preference data before your product ever reaches the shelf.
How we run a hall test for you. We recruit respondents matching your consumer profile (age, gender, category usage) from our database. On test day, participants arrive at a rented venue — a hotel conference room, shopping mall space, or dedicated research studio — and evaluate your products following a strict protocol. Each person receives the same portion size, at the same temperature, in the same order (or rotated order, depending on the design). Our moderators manage the flow, interviewers record responses on tablets, and you can observe via a live video feed.
The method your competitors use — and why. Hall tests are the industry standard for FMCG product development, pharma packaging assessment, and food & beverage R&D across Poland and Europe. When Pepsi runs a blind taste test against Coca-Cola, that is a hall test. When a cosmetics brand compares three fragrance variants before selecting one for production — that is a hall test. The method works because it eliminates noise: no distractions from home, no uncontrolled variables, no guessing whether the respondent actually tried the product.
Blind tests, triangle tests, and everything in between. We run monadic tests (one product, pure reaction), sequential monadic (two products in rotation to eliminate order bias), paired comparisons (side by side), and triangle tests (three samples — spot the odd one out). For R&D teams, we offer full Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) with trained expert panels. All methodology follows ISO 13299 and ASTM E18 standards — so your results hold up in front of regulators, trade partners, and internal stakeholders.
What it costs and how long it takes. A standard monadic test with 100 respondents at one location runs 1–2 days and costs approximately PLN 20,000–40,000 (venue, recruitment, fieldwork, data included). Multi-city tests (e.g., Warsaw + Krakow + Gdansk) capture regional preferences but extend the timeline proportionally. Compared to CAPI field research, hall tests are faster and cheaper for the same sample size — because respondents come to you, not the other way around.
Source: ESOMAR Global Market Research 2024
| Format | How It Works | Best For | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|
Monadic Test |
One product evaluated in isolation |
Launch readiness, first impression |
100–200 |
Sequential Monadic |
2–3 products in rotation (order randomised) |
Variant comparison, reformulation |
150–300 |
Paired Comparison |
Two products side by side |
Detecting subtle sensory differences |
100–200 |
Triangle Test |
3 samples: 2 identical + 1 different |
Recipe change verification, QC |
60–100 |
Blind Test |
Products served without brand identity |
Objective competitive benchmarking |
100–200 |
QDA (Sensory Profile) |
Trained expert panel rates attribute intensity |
R&D, recipe optimisation |
8–15 experts |
Venue booking, product transport, portion preparation, temperature control, waste disposal — you focus on the brief, we handle the rest.
We recruit from our respondent pool using screening questionnaires — category users, right demographics, taste sensitivity verified.
All sensory tests follow ISO 13299 and ASTM E18 standards. Results your R&D team and regulators will accept.
Watch respondents evaluate your product via live video feed. See real reactions before reading the data.
Standards & Compliance in Sensory Research
All sensory hall tests at Fieldstat comply with international quality standards. ISO 13299:2016 governs sensory profiling methodology — from assessor selection through sample preparation to statistical analysis. ASTM International (Committee E18) publishes detailed standards for triangle tests (E1885), sample serving protocols (E1871), and environmental requirements (E2299). In Poland, consumer research ethics are governed by PTBRiO and the ICC/ESOMAR International Code. Adherence to these standards ensures your results are reliable, reproducible, and accepted by trade partners and regulators.
You tell us what to test and why. We recommend the right format (monadic, blind, triangle) and build the evaluation protocol.
We screen and recruit respondents from our database — category users matching your target consumer profile.
We book the location, transport products, set up tasting stations, and calibrate conditions (temperature, lighting, portions).
Respondents arrive in waves. Products are served following rotation protocol. Data is captured on tablets in real time.
You receive preference scores, sensory profiles, statistical significance tests, and a report with actionable R&D recommendations.
A standard monadic test with 100 respondents at one location costs approximately PLN 20,000–40,000 (venue, recruitment, fieldwork, data delivery included). Multi-product or multi-city tests cost more due to logistics. Expert panel QDA analysis adds a premium for trained assessor recruitment.
Typically 100–300 for consumer preference studies. For expert sensory panels (QDA), 8–15 trained assessors are sufficient. We can test 50–200 respondents per day at a single location, depending on test complexity.
We run tests in Warsaw, Krakow, Wroclaw, Gdansk, Poznan, and other major cities. Venues include hotel conference rooms, shopping mall spaces, and dedicated research studios. Multi-city tests capture regional taste differences.
Yes — competitive blind tests are one of our most popular formats. Products are served in neutral packaging with numeric codes. Respondents evaluate without knowing the brand, giving you an unbiased comparison of product perception.
Preparation (questionnaire, recruitment, logistics) takes 2–3 weeks. Fieldwork runs 1–5 days per city. You receive the report within 1 week after fieldwork ends. Total timeline: 4–6 weeks.
Food, beverages, cosmetics, household chemicals, packaging, prototypes, advertising materials (print and video), electronic devices, and appliances. Essentially anything that benefits from sensory or visual evaluation under standardised conditions.
They serve different purposes. Hall tests give you controlled, comparable data — ideal for product vs. product decisions. HUT gives you naturalistic usage data — how people use the product at home over days or weeks. We often recommend running both.
Yes. We set up a live video feed so your team can watch respondent reactions in real time from a separate room or remotely. This is invaluable for R&D and marketing teams who want to see — not just read — how consumers respond to their product.
This method is frequently used in the following research solutions: